Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The single question on this appeal is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the finding that at the time of his accident appellant was on a personal mission and was not performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment.

The facts briefly stated are as follows: Appellant, age twenty-three, was employed as an automobile salesman by the Berlin Motors, at Berlin, Wisconsin. Pie completed .the sale of a used car to a customer at about 10:30 p. m. on August 31, 1939. Soon thereafter, in company with the customer and a Mr. Kratz, who was also an automobile salesman for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Booth v. FrankensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Widell Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Winter v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Racine County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Tewes v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hope Acres, Inc. v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lager v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Richardson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API