Booth v. Frankenstein
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Defendant’s first contention is that the evidence does not sustain the finding of the jury that deceased was negligent. This requires an examination of the facts. The collision occurred about six o’clock in the evening of January 30, 1931. The plaintiff was driving his Chevrolet truck in a southerly direction on state trunk highway 29, a short distance south of Stanley. The deceased was driving his Oldsmobile coupe in a northerly direction on this highway. Plaintiff’s truck was equipped with a platform eighty-two inches wide, which extended ten inches beyond the wheels and was not equipped…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seligman v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Reilly v. . Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Braithwaite v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Hamilton v. ReinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Fretz v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Feldstein v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Krantz v. KrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.