Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1949PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnviN, J.

The-'appellants place their chief emphasis in this Court upon their exceptions to the refusal of the trial court to allow their motions for involuntary judgments of nonsuit made when the State rested its case and renewed when ail the evidence was concluded.

' When the State undertook to prosecute the prisoner, Jim Palmer, for the slaying of the deceased, Otis McNeill, it necessarily assumed the burden of producing evidence sufficient to prove two things: (1) That the deceased died by virtue of a criminal act; and (2) that such criminal act was committed by the prisoner. S. v. Howell, 218 N.C.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . MaysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. State v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API