Legal Opinion
Sepulveda v. Ishimaru
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1957No. Civ. 17097PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action for personal injury suffered by plaintiffs Mr. and Mrs. Sepulveda when during the making of a right-hand turn the right rear of their car was hit by the right front of a car driven by defendant Ayako Ishimaru with the consent of its owner defendant George Ishimaru. The verdict was for defendants. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied and they appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.
It is not contended that the evidence does not support the verdict, correctly so, as it was in substantial conflict, defendant Ayako Ishimaru testifying that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miller v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Granone v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Deward v. CloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Finch v. Brenda Raceway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.