State v. Strawther

The appellant has filed three propositions of law which contend the trial court substantially. complied with Crim. E. 11 despite his failure to orally advise the appellee that in pleading guilty to attempt to commit murder and aggravated robbery (E. C. 2903.02 and 2911.01), he would be waiving his right to the use of the compulsory process of the court to obtain witnesses in his behalf.

*300As tó Crim. R. 11, this court in State v. Caudill (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 342, held:

“1. In accepting a written plea of no contest to a felony charge, the trial court must adhere scrupulously to the provisions of…