Luster v. First Nat. Bank in Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, C.
This suit was instituted in the district court of Murray county, Okla., by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to recover the sum of $2,000, with interest and attorney’s fee, as evidenced by a certain promissory note. The defendants filed what they denominated a plea in abatement and aver that the cause should be dismissed for the reason that the action was prematurely brought. The action was instituted on August 16, 1923, and defendants aver that the time of payment on the note had been extended until September 2, 1923,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lambuth v. Stetson & Post, Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lowrance v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Sosbee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Biggs v. Federal Land Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Universal Life Insurance v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.