Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McDade

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1887No. 12,882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellee instituted this action before a justice of the peace and obtained judgment for fifty dollars. The appellant appealed from that judgment to the circuit court, and in that court the appellee recovered judgment for the same amount as that awarded by the justice of the peace. While the case was pending in the circuit court the appellee amended his complaint so as to claim judgment for sixty dollars. In this court a motion to dismiss the appeal is vigorously pressed.

This motion must prevail. It is not the amount demanded in the complaint which governs, but the amount of recovery, for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Painter v. GuirlIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Parsley v. EskewIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Sprinkle v. ToneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CoyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. TrimbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Schultz v. AlterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Knowlton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Colliery Engineer Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. YardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API