Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Alter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1915No. 8,807PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Jasper Circuit Court; Charles W. Hanley, Judge. Action by Leslie B. Alter against Paul L. Schultz and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.

Appellee brought this action against appellants in the Jasper Circuit Court, asking $150 damages for the death of a brood mare, alleged to have been caused by appellants’ negligence,- and recovered a judgment for $25, from which appellants are appealing. Under §§1389, 1391 Burns 1914, Acts 1903 p. 280, Acts 1901 p. 565, no appeal can be taken to the Supreme Court or Appellate Court in a civil case, where the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed $50, unless there is duly presented the question of the validity of a franchise or the validity of a municipal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vandalia Railroad v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Painter v. GuirlIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McDadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Baker v. GrovesIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Sneath Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vandalia Railroad v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Catherwood v. McIntyreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Essington v. BowmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Jerzakowski v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Galvin v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API