Legal Opinion

Painter v. Guirl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7412PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This suit was commenced by the appellee, against the appellant, before a justice of the peace of Jennings county, Indiana, to recover damages in the sum of seventy dollars, for or on account of the appellant’s alleged abuse of a certain mare, hired to him by the appellee. The trial of the cause by a jury, before the justice, resulted in a verdict and judgment for the appellee in the sum of twenty dollars. An appeal was taken from this judgment, by the appellant, the defendant below, to the circuit court of said county; where another trial of the cause by a jury was had, resulting in a verdict…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cowley v. Town of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bogart v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Dailey v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Klebar v. Town of CorydonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McDadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Schultz v. AlterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Wagner v. KastnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API