Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Yard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1893No. 1,026PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The question of jurisdiction confronts us at the threshold of this case. The action originated *200before the mayor of the city of Peru, and was one in which damages were claimed for the killing of the appellee’s cow of the value of $50. The appellee recovered $50 before the mayor. An appeal was taken by the railroad company to the circuit court, where the appellee again recovered the amount of $50.

Filed Nov. 23, 1893.

Prom this judgment the present appeal is attempted to be prosecuted.

Section 632, R. S. 1881, authorizes an appeal from such judgment as the one under consideration only in cases…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. McDadeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State ex rel. School Corp. of Lebanon v. WillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colliery Engineer Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Semke v. WilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. B. & A. Drilling Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Gary Railways Co. v. CinkoskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API