Sawyer v. United States Steel Co. And Nine Other Cases
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN, BAZE-LON, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
The order entered by this court on April 30,1952, was designed, as it recited, to preserve the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court and of this court over the controversies here presented, pending appeal.
The District Court thought that there was “utter and complete lack of authoritative support” for the Government’s position, and that the steel companies would suffer irreparable injury by any continuance of Government possession of the mills. [103 F.Supp. 569, 576]
The Supreme Court said as long ago as 1871:
“* * *…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Pewee Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Board of Supervisors v. TureaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Cab Operating Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Young v. Netherlands Owners, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.