United States v. Russell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Glieeokd
Private property, the Constitution provides, shall not be taken for public use without just compensation, and it is clear that there are few safeguards ordained in the fundamental law against oppression and the exercise of arbitrary power of more ancient origin or of greater value to the citizen, as the provision for compensation, except in certain extreme cases, is a condition precedent annexed to the right of the Government to deprive the owner of his property without his consent. — (2 Kent Com., 11th ed., 339; 2 Story on Const-., 3d ed., 59C.)
Extraordinary and unforeseen occasions arise,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Filor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Curtis's Administratrix v. FiedlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
3Cited by84 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Crozier v. Fried. Krupp AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.