Legal Opinion

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1952No. 744PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

343 U.S. 579 (1952)

YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. ET AL.

v.

SAWYER.

No. 744.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued May 12-13, 1952.

Decided June 2, 1952.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.[*]

John W. Davis argued the cause for petitioners in No. 744 and respondents in No. 745. On the brief were Mr. Davis, Nathan L. Miller, John Lord O'Brian, Roger M. Blough, Theodore Kiendl, Porter R. Chandler and Howard C. Westwood for the United States Steel Co.; Bruce Bromley, E. Fontaine Brown and John H. Pickering for the Bethlehem Steel Co.; Luther Day, T. F.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Black; Concurrence · Frankfurter; Concurrence · Douglas; Concurring in the judgment · Jackson; Concurrence · Burton; Concurring in the judgment · Clark; Dissent.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Oregon Restaurant and Lodging v. Thomas PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API