Board of Supervisors v. Tureaud
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
After long and serious study of the petition for rehearing the majority of the court has reached the conclusion that a rehearing should be granted. These are some of the considerations which have led to that conclusion:
The complaint alleged that the action of the Supervisors and other administrative officers of L.S.U., in refusing to admit plaintiff as a student at L.S.U., in the category which he sought, pursuant to the state Constitution and statutory provisions, was violative of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, and for this reason a statutory court of three judges, 28…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sweatt v. PainterSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Samuel Saiken v. Peter B. Bensinger and John J. TwomeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Davis v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD CTY., VA.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1956
- Hess v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1957
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BengtsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Brown v. RippyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.