Thornton v. Conrad
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kathleen Ann Keough, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Sysco Food Services of Cleveland, Inc. (“Sysco”), appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion for a new trial of appellee, Eugene Thornton. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.
I
{¶ 2} Thornton was employed by Sysco. On January 1, 2001, Thornton, walking with a noticeable limp, approached his supervisor and asked under what conditions a drug test would be required if he sought medical attention. Thornton’s supervisor reminded him of Sysco’s policy that a drug-and-alcohol test was mandatory if an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Whiston v. Bio-Lab, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- McLeod v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Potocnik v. Sifco Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elsner v. Birchall, M.D.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Fin. Freedom Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Heirs of ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jawary v. UnderwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WiramOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.