Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Conrad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2011No. 95982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kathleen Ann Keough, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Sysco Food Services of Cleveland, Inc. (“Sysco”), appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion for a new trial of appellee, Eugene Thornton. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.

I

{¶ 2} Thornton was employed by Sysco. On January 1, 2001, Thornton, walking with a noticeable limp, approached his supervisor and asked under what conditions a drug test would be required if he sought medical attention. Thornton’s supervisor reminded him of Sysco’s policy that a drug-and-alcohol test was mandatory if an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Whiston v. Bio-Lab, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. McLeod v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Potocnik v. Sifco Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elsner v. Birchall, M.D.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Fin. Freedom Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Heirs of ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Jawary v. UnderwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. JP Morgan Chase Bank v. WiramOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API