Legal Opinion

Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1916No. S. F. No. 7020PublishedCited by 75 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a motion to vacate an award in arbitration proceedings. J. M. Seawell, Judge. . The facts are .stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

A controversy existed between the plaintiff and the defendant with regard to a claim by the plaintiff that the defendant was indebted to it in the sum of $236,735.28, on account of the construction by the plaintiff of the defendant’s railroad, and the claim of the defendant that such indebtedness had been discharged by the execution and delivery to the plaintiff by defendant of fifteen checks aggregating $153,562.24 and nine checks aggregating $83,175.04 upon the California Safe Deposit and Trust Company, bearing date October 22, 1907. On April 29, 1910, the parties agreed in writing to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Oddie v. . the Nat. City Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API