Legal Opinion

Alaska Railroad Corp. v. Native Village of Eklutna

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2006No. S-11619Published

1Opinion of the Court

142 P.3d 1192 (2006)

ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

NATIVE VILLAGE OF EKLUTNA and Municipality of Anchorage, Appellees.

No. S-11619.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

September 1, 2006.

William S. Cummings and Kelly McCann, Ashburn & Mason, Anchorage, for Appellant.

Sara E. Heideman, Hedland Brennan & Heideman, Anchorage, for Appellee Native Village of Eklutna.

Thomas McDermott, Assistant Municipal Attorney, and Frederick H. Boness, Municipal Attorney, Anchorage, for Appellee Municipality of Anchorage.

Before: BRYNER, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, FABE, and CARPENETI, Justices.

OPINION

FABE,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Blatchford v. Native Village of NoatakSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API