Graham Oil Co. v. BP Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BLOCH, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss a portion of Counts I and II of plaintiffs amended complaint, and all of Counts III, VI, IX, X, XI, and XII of plaintiffs amended complaint. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the Court will deny defendant’s motion to dismiss a portion of Counts I and II, and deny defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts III, VI, IX and X. The Court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts XI and XII of plaintiffs amended complaint.
I. Background
This action arises out of a dispute between plaintiff,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Connecticut v. American Elec. Power Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Boring v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Reynolds v. RUCK'S MUSHROOM SERVICE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States v. Union Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Two Rivers Terminal, L.P. v. Chevron USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.