Two Rivers Terminal, L.P. v. Chevron USA, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ■
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
In counts II, III, and VI of the complaint, the plaintiff, Two Rivers Terminal, L.P., has set forth claims under federal and state environmental statutes. The suit arises from petroleum contamination at a gasoline and fuel oil terminal formerly owned and operated by the defendant, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (CUSA), and now owned by the plaintiff.
Count II sets forth a claim under the Pennsylvania Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act (the Tank Act), 35 P.S. §§ 6021.101-6021.2104 (Purdon & Purdon Supp.1999-2000); count III under the Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) PhotographsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Donald Showalter v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Walls v. Waste Resource Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fiorentino v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hackensack Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Delaware Ostego Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- College Park Holdings, LLC v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
- Carney Hospital Transitional Care Unit v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Wildlands v. Scott Timber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.