Legal Opinion

United States v. Union Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2003No. CIV.A.9-01589PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1980, the United States (“Plaintiff’ or “the Government”) sued individual defendants Irvin G. Schorsch, Jr. and John B. Schorsch, and corporate defendants Union Corporation and Metal Bank of America, Inc. (collectively “the Metal Bank defendants” or “third-party plaintiffs”), seeking reimbursement for past and future response costs to investigate the Cottman Avenue Superfund site (“the Site”) in Philadelphia and for enforcement pursuant to section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Berg v. PophamAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Adobe Lumber, Inc. v. HellmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. City of Lodi, Cal.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
  5. Degussa Constr. Chem. Operations, Inc. v. Berwind Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API