Legal Opinion

Sienkiewicz v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1982No. 48187-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

We are asked to decide whether an earnest money agreement which violates the platting and subdivision statutes may be specifically enforced. We hold that, under the facts of this case, the earnest money agreement may be specifically enforced.

In 1977, Gary and Shirley Smith, appellants in the Court of Appeals, decided to sell their home and adjacent undeveloped land. Unable to find a buyer, they agreed with their real estate agent to sell the undeveloped land and house separately.

Walter Sienkiewicz, respondent in the Court of Appeals and petitioner here, offered to buy the undeveloped land. In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hederman v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Crown Cascade, Inc. v. O'NEALWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hickory Point Partnership v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Seymour v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API