Legal Opinion

Neibarger v. Universal Cooperatives, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1989No. Docket 111029PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order of the circuit court granting summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) to defendants on the basis of the running of the four-year period of limitations as provided in the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.2725; MSA 19.2725. We affirm.

i

Plaintiffs, owners and operators of a dairy farm, contracted with defendant Charles Brinker to install a milking system. According to plaintiffs, the milking system was designed by defendants Universal Cooperatives, Inc., and Brinker, and was installed by Brinker to begin milking operations on September 1, 1979.

Pl…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Agristor Leasing v. Gene E.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
  2. McGhee v. GMC Truck & Coach Division, General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Agristor Leasing v. GuggisbergDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  5. Agristor Leasing v. SpindlerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. McFadden v. ImusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
  5. Houghton v. Alfa-Laval, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API