Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Imus

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1992No. Docket 129577PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

This breach of contract case arises from plaintiff’s failed attempt to purchase an automobile dealership owned and operated by defendants R. A. Imus and R. A. Imus, Inc. Plaintiff appeals as of right from a Van Burén Circuit Court order granting defendants summary disposition.

The purported contract between the parties, dated June 7, 1989, provides:

I, R.A. Imus sell my business to Richard McFadden for $75,000.00. Payments to be made as follows:

$5,000.00 upon completion of written agreement and approval of Chrysler Motors

$20,000.00 upon completion of transfer of Franchise agreement

$1…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haywood v. FowlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Marina Bay Condominiums, Inc v. SchlegelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Neibarger v. Universal Cooperatives, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Fields v. KornMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. MacKe Laundry Service Co. v. OvergaardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Alcona County v. Wolverine Environmental Production, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Allmand Associates, Inc. v. Hercules Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Home Insurance v. Detroit Fire Extinguisher Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API