Legal Opinion
Agristor Leasing v. Spindler
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 30, 1987No. Civ. 84-1049PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, Chief Judge. Gentlemen:
This action was initially commenced on June 28, 1984 by Agristor Leasing (Agristor). Agristor alleges that Arlyn and Rose Spindler defaulted on an agricultural equipment lease agreement and are in wrongful possession of the equipment subject to the agreement.
Almost one month later, the Spindlers filed a third party complaint against North Central Harvestore, Inc. (NCH) and A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. (AOS). Spindlers’ third party complaint was subsequently amended on May 30, 1985.
Third party defendant AOS filed on May 5, 1986…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Lennox v. Mitek Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Brookings Municipal Utilities, Inc. v. Amoco Chemical Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2000
- Myers v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- Diamond Surface, Inc. v. State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.