Legal Opinion

Agristor Leasing v. Gene E.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 29, 1986No. 84-1527-KPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, AgriStor Leasing (AgriStor) brought this action against defendants Gene E. and Rose M. Meuli (Meuli) alleging breach of lease and wrongful detention of certain farm equipment. The leased equipment included a Harvestore system, which is a large grain silo designed for preserving and storing feed for livestock, and a Slurry-store system, which is designed for preserving manure for fertilization. Plaintiff has previously repossessed the Harvestore and Slurrystore systems and now seeks damages for defendants’ failure to pay rent.…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. AgriStor Leasing v. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  3. D'Huyvetter v. A.O. Smith Harvestore ProductsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
  5. Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API