United States v. Rodney Phillip Tidwell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
Rodney Tidwell appeals his jury conviction and sentence, primarily contending that the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (“NAGPRA”) is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm the conviction and the sentence imposed by the district court.
I
Defendant-appellant Rodney Tidwell and Ernest Chapella were indicted on twelve counts of illegal trafficking in Native American cultural items, eleven counts of theft of tribal property, one count of trafficking in unlawfully removed archaeological resources, one count of interstate transportation of stolen property, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Roberto Nicolas CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Nunez v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. VargasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- United States v. William AubreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.