Legal Opinion
Nunez v. City of San Diego
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1997No. 96-55290PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the City of San Diego’s juvenile curfew ordinance. The district court granted summary judgment for the City, and plaintiffs appealed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse.
THE ORDINANCE
The City of San Diego enacted its juvenile curfew ordinance in 1947. The ordinance reads as follows:
It shall be unlawful for any minor under the age of eighteen (18) years, to loiter, idle, wander, stroll or play in or upon the public streets, highways, roads, alleys, parks, playgrounds, wharves, docks, or other public…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hutchins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Granite State Insurance Company, Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Granite State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.