United States v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Richard C. Armstrong was convicted by a jury of participating in a racially motivated assault against an African American man. Armstrong now appeals his sentence. He contends that the district court erred in imposing two enhancements: one for selecting a victim on the basis of race and one for obstruction of justice. Additionally, he argues that the sentence as a whole was procedurally flawed and substantively unreasonable. We address whether a defendant may avoid an enhancement for selecting a victim on the basis of race if his co-defendant selected the victim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Citlalli FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Eric GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robert KahreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- ALVARADOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
- United States v. Derrick PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.