Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2010No. 09-30395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Richard C. Armstrong was convicted by a jury of participating in a racially motivated assault against an African American man. Armstrong now appeals his sentence. He contends that the district court erred in imposing two enhancements: one for selecting a victim on the basis of race and one for obstruction of justice. Additionally, he argues that the sentence as a whole was procedurally flawed and substantively unreasonable. We address whether a defendant may avoid an enhancement for selecting a victim on the basis of race if his co-defendant selected the victim…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Citlalli FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Eric GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Robert KahreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. ALVARADOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
  5. United States v. Derrick PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API