United States v. William Aubrey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
For purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1163, funds paid from an Indian tribal organization to a contractor continue to be “property belonging to any Indian tribal organization,” as long as the tribal organization maintains sufficient supervision and control of disbursed funds and their ultimate use. Accordingly, we reject William Aubrey’s contention that the evidence presented at his trial was insufficient to prove that he converted or misused property belonging to an Indian tribal organization in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1163. We also deny Aubrey’s other challenges to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Neil A. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Kenneth DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Yi-Chi ShihCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Adebola Adefunke AdebimpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Joshua David Mellberg LLC v. WillDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.