Legal Opinion

Porter v. Bayliner Marine Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 1998No. 84, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

We granted certiorari in this case to address an issue not heretofore considered by Maryland courts, whether, when an award by the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“Commission”) requiring periodic payments is satisfied by a single lump sum payment, without Commission approval, Maryland Code (1957,1991 RepLVol.) § 9-736 of the Labor and Employment Article 1 bars the reopening of the claim giving rise to the award more than five years after the lump sum payment is made, and, thus, any modification of that award. The Commission determined that it did, and, on judicial review,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Blevins v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Chesapeake Amusements, Inc. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API