Legal Opinion
Romaine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 2006No. 62 EAP 2004PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
Gloria Romaine (Claimant) appeals by allowance from an Order of the Commonwealth Court affirming an Order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) dismissing as untimely filed, her Petition to Reinstate Terminated Benefits. Section 413(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act)1 requires that a Petition to Reinstate Terminated Benefits be filed within three years of the most recent payment of compensation. The issue we must resolve is when the most recent payment of compensation occurred in this…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- State ex rel. Nyitray v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Bellotti v. SpaederSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- S. A. Loux & Son v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- LeVan v. Independence Mall, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Schwab v. Pennsummit Tubular, LLC (In Re Old Summit Manufacturing, LLC)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Pennsylvania State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.