Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Cassidy

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 1995No. 59PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

We granted certiorari to determine whether the loss of two eyes in a single accident, which does not result in permanent total disability, is compensable pursuant to Maryland Code (1991) § 9-627(d)(l)(vi), of the Labor and Employment Article, at double the rate for the loss of one eye, or under § 9-627(k), “Other Cases.” The Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the Commission”) determined that such a loss, together with other injuries sustained in the same accident, constituted an 85% industrial loss of use of the body, and, thus, was compensable under the latter provision. Neither…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Montgomery County v. BuckmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. C & P TELEPHONE CO. OF MD. v. Director of Finance, City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Fraternal Order of Police, Montgomery County Lodge No. 35 v. MehrlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API