Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1982No. 2504PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal comes before us following the lower court’s denial of relief pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act 1 (PCHA). This appeal has been submitted on briefs without oral argument. Appellant’s brief fails to conform with numerous appellate rules, and because the deviation is substantial, we find our ability to conduct meaningful appellate review severely impaired. Given the inadequacy of the appellant’s brief we have no recourse and must quash the appeal without reaching the merits.

The inadequate aspects of appellant’s brief are not mere matters of form or taste, rather they are the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. HolcombSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. SpuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API