Commonwealth v. Holcomb
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant’s brief being so defective as to be useless to the Court, the appeal is quashed in accordance with Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 2101. See also, Rule 2118, Pa.R.A.P., and Commonwealth v. Wyant, 254 Pa.Super. 464, 386 A.2d 43 (1978). The prothonotary is directed to send a copy of this order directly to appellant.
JACOBS, P. J., and SPAETH, J., would affirm. WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. WyantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. DrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. StoppieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.