Commonwealth v. Sanford
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
This appeal from judgments of sentence for burglary, robbery, conspiracy and terroristic threats has been submitted on briefs without oral argument. The brief filed by appellant violates numerous appellate rules and does not permit a determination of those rulings or issues which he wishes to have reviewed. Because appellant’s inadequate brief impairs our ability to conduct meaningful appellate review of the trial, we quash the appeal without reaching the merits.
Pa.R.App.P. 2116(a) requires that a brief contain a statement of the questions involved. Specifically, the rule…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Keller v. Old Lycoming TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. WyantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Banking v. GesiorskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. TchirkowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- First Union Mortgage Corp. v. FrempongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.