Legal Opinion

Ridenhour v. . Ridenhour

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Appellant in brief filed in this Court challenges the judgment.of Gwyn, J., entered at February Term, 1945, upon two grounds : First and foremost: It is contended that Armstrong, J., having entered the, order of 12 June, 1944, the matter of the custody of the children was thereby res judicata, and therefore Gwyn, J., holding a subsequent regular term of court in the county was without authority to modify the former order without allegations or affidavits to the effect that conditions surrounding the situation had changed since the entry of the former order. The answer to this contention is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Vaughan v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. City of Reidsville v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Ragan v. . RaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API