City of Reidsville v. Slade
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Careful consideration of the five questions involved on this appeal, as stated in brief of defendants, appellants, fails to disclose error for which the judgment below may be disturbed.
1. At the outset defendants contend that Sink, J., was without jurisdiction, at the time he acted, to vacate or modify the temporary injunction made by Carr, J. If an injunction be granted without notice, as in this case, it is provided by statute, G. S., 1-498, formerly O. S., 8.56, that the defendant, that is, the party enjoined, “at any time before the trial, may apply, upon notice to be fixed by court of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Holly Shelter Railroad v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Whitford v. North Carolina Joint-Stock Land Bank of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Western Carolina Power Co. v. MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Airport Authority v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Ridenhour v. . RidenhourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.