Securities & Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Senior District Judge:
The Supreme Court reaffirmed only recently that a fundamental purpose of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. (“1934 Act” or “Act”) was “to protect investors against manipulation of stock prices” and to implement a “philosophy of full disclosure.” Basic Inc., et al. v. Levinson, et al., — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 978, 982, 99 L.Ed.2d 194 (1988). In delivering the ruling, Justice Blackmun was addressing problems of false statements and materiality under section 10(b) of the Act. The same underlying…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Lou v. BelzbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.