United States v. Levy
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In preparing a true-false test, perceptive teachers, while aware of the possibility of pure chance-guessing, will phrase the false statement to be so close to the truth that students are required to be precise in making their choice. In drafting an indictment for perjury, however, a grand jury must take exactly the opposite tack. No guessing is tolerated and the indictment must set out the allegedly perjurious statements and the objective truth in stark contrast so that the claim of falsity is clear to all who read the charge. In the appeal at hand, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WongSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Estelle Jacobs A/K/A 'Mrs. Kramer,'Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Shillinger v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.