Legal Opinion

CytoSport, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 6, 2012No. 2:08-CV-02632-JAM-GGHPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1289ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS CLAIMS, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT’S COUNTER-CLAIMS, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on two motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc. (“CytoSport”) against Defendant Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“VPX”). The first motion is for judgment on counter-claims raised by VPX in its Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim (Doc. # 115-1). VPX opposes the motion (Doc. # 199). The second motion…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewert v. Boiron, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. Deerpoint Group, Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Jason Rothman v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2026
  4. RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API