RingCentral, Inc. v. Nextiva, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 RINGCENTRAL, INC., Case No. 19-cv-02626-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND 13 STRIKE COUNTERCLAIMS NEXTIVA, INC., et al., 14 Re: Dkt. No. 72 Defendants. 15 16 17 Before the Court is plaintiff RingCentral, Inc.’s motion to dismiss and strike 18 Nextiva, Inc.’s counterclaims. Dkt. No. 72. RingCentral argues that Nextiva’s 19 counterclaims contain the same errors that led to the dismissal of RingCentral’s original 20 complaint. The Court finds that Nextiva has sufficiently alleged…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.