Savage v. Van Marle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
Defendant appeals from a $1,670,792 judgment for plaintiffs in a personal injury action tried by the court without a jury. In its findings and conclusions, the court determined that defendant was guilty of willful misconduct. Defendant attacks the judgment on two grounds: (1) The finding of willful misconduct was beyond the scope of the pleadings and (2) references by plaintiffs’ counsel during trial to a judgment nondischargeable in bankruptcy constituted prejudicial misconduct.
The pertinent facts are as follows:
Plaintiff, a 19-year-old young man, suffered severe, permanent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooper v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Terzian v. California Casualty Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Private Carriage v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993