Legal Opinion

Savage v. Van Marle

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1974No. Civ. 13054PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, J.

Defendant appeals from a $1,670,792 judgment for plaintiffs in a personal injury action tried by the court without a jury. In its findings and conclusions, the court determined that defendant was guilty of willful misconduct. Defendant attacks the judgment on two grounds: (1) The finding of willful misconduct was beyond the scope of the pleadings and (2) references by plaintiffs’ counsel during trial to a judgment nondischargeable in bankruptcy constituted prejudicial misconduct.

The pertinent facts are as follows:

Plaintiff, a 19-year-old young man, suffered severe, permanent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Terzian v. California Casualty Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Private Carriage v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API