Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the judgment and in much of the reasoning of the majority opinion. In particular, I agree with the majority that recovery of fear-of-cancer damages in toxic exposure cases not involving immediate physical injury should be subject to the following conditions: When a defendant has caused the plaintiff to unknowingly ingest toxic chemicals by an act or omission that is merely negligent, the plaintiff may recover damages for emotional distress caused by fear of future cancer only upon proof of a more-than-even chance that cancer will actually…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Acadia, California, Ltd. v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.