Legal Opinion

Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1993No. S018831PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

6 Cal.4th 965 (1993)

863 P.2d 795

25 Cal. Rptr.2d 550

FRANK POTTER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. S018831.

Supreme Court of California.

December 27, 1993.

COUNSEL

Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler, Pierce O'Donnell, Gerard Fox, Jeffrey Miles, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, John W. Fowler, John R. Reese, Patricia L. Walker, Warner & Hogan, Charles G. Warner and Harvey M. Grossman for Defendant and Appellant.

Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Thomas W. Brunner, Laura A. Foggan, Frederick S. Ansell, Stephen D. Goldman, Sullivan,…

2Cases cited114 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. (PS) Conerly v. Veracity Research CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PS) Novak v. MendezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PS) Ponthieux v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Bird v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API