Terzian v. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
This is an appeal by the insured (Terzian) from an adverse judgment in his action against his insurer (California Casualty) after a court trial of a previously undetermined issue after reversal by this court (Division Four) in Terzian v. California Cas. Indem. Exch., 3 Cal.App.3d 90 [83 Cal.Rptr. 255]. The contentions are that: 1) the trial court erred in going beyond the record to determine that the insured’s action against the uninsured motorist was based on wilful and malicious injury and, therefore, was not dischargeable in bankruptcy; and 2) in any event, the insurer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bielski v. Wolverine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Allstate Insurance Company v. PietroshNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Andeen v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. KowalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Calhoun v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Fisher v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Fisher v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BrekkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.