Legal Opinion

Holohan v. McCarthy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN J.

Peter J. Holohan, as plaintiff, instituted this suit for the purpose, among other things, of establishing a trust in certain real and personal property of the estate of Margaret L. Holohan, his deceased wife. Plaintiff had decree and defendant Lida J. McCarthy, appeals. Dennis J. Holohan, executor of the last will and testament of Peter J. Holohan, deceased, and Dennis J. Holohan, Guy E. Holohan and Lew Holohan, heirs at law of Peter J. Holohan, deceased, are substituted as parties plaintiff and respondent in lieu of Peter J. Holohan, deceased. The present defendants in this suit are…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Springer v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gildersleeve v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Barger v. BargerOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Johnson v. HelmerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Goff v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Suter v. SuterIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lewis v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Vezey v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Matter of Estate of HurlbuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. SHIPE v. HillmanOregon Supreme Court · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API