Legal Opinion

Bogle v. Paulson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman,j.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decree of the Circuit Court which dismissed his suit. The latter was instituted for the purpose of securing a decree holding that (1) the appellant' and the respondent, on April 7,1946, became joint adventurers in the business of dealing in stands of timber; (2) the alleged joint enterprise purchased three tracts of timber that were later sold by the respondent at. a profit; (3) one-half of the.profit belonged to the appellant; (4) the respondent should render an accounting; and (5) the appellant is entitled .to judgment for one-half of the profit.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gilliam v. SchoenOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Biersdorf v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Joseph v. Donover Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cole v. FOGELOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Zanetti v. ZanettiWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API