St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Stitt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action for damages for personal injuries commenced by defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below.
It appears that the plaintiff was employed) by the defendant as a boiler maker and that at the time of his injury he’ was engaged in prossering the flues of one of the defendant’s locomotives at its regular repair and machine shop located in West Tulsa. The engine under repair was used in hauling a passenger train running between Enid and Tulsa, two Oklahoma cities, a round trip being made daily over a part of the line entirely within the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Comben v. Belleville Stone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meierotto v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Shell Petroleum Corporation v. PerrinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Claris v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Rota-Cone Oil Field Operating Co. v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- WeGo Perforators v. HilligossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.