Legal Opinion

Claris v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1934No. 6104PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

March 30, 1933, appellant instituted this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act for the recovery of damages in the sum of $35,000 for the loss of his eye by reason of the alleged negligence of respondent.

Appellant, an employee of respondent, working as a machinist in the shops at Pocatello and while engaged in greasing a rod bushing as a part of the repair of an engine used in interstate commerce, turned a lever or valve to actuate the operation of a grease gun built and maintained by respondent and located in its auxiliary machine-shop and a volume of grease, water, metal…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kroetch v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
  4. New York, N. H. & H. R. v. VizvariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. Robinson v. Belmont-Buckingham Holding Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hobbs v. Union Pacific R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Allan v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stowers v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Evans v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API