Legal Opinion

Comben v. Belleville Stone Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On error to the Essex County Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

On March 7th, 1894, one Robert Comben, the intestate of the plaintiff in error, was employed by the defendant in error in working in its stone or rock quarry at Avondale, in the State of New Jersey, and whilst so working he was, by the operation of the machinery and appliances of the defendant in use in its quarry, thrown from a ledge of rock where he was working and killed. The plaintiff in error is his widow, and sues the defendant company for damages resulting to her as his widow, and to his two brothers, as his next of kin. At the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bahr v. Lombard, Ayres & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  2. The Nord Deutscher Lloyd Steamship Co. v. IngebregstenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  3. Van Steenburgh v. ThorntonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Inland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Curley v. HoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. StittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Belleville Stone Co. v. CombenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. AltimusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API